Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Barnstable Patriot
Barnstable, Massachusetts
June 9, 2006     Barnstable Patriot
PAGE 7     (7 of 36 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 7     (7 of 36 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
June 9, 2006
 
Newspaper Archive of Barnstable Patriot produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




Munafo 's school budget vote founded in fundamentalism - EG F^ •JE: CORNER By Paul Gauvin pgauvin@barnstablepatriot.com Four men seated at a picnic table are arguing vehemently about the local school budget. Finally, one man blurts out that to settle the argument, they should have a vote. All agree, and it turns out be a three to one. "See?" says one of three to the lone dissenter, "You're wrong." But the lone voter plods on. "I'm right ,"he insists "and toprove it Til ask God who iscorrect."He looks up to the heavens and asks "God,who isright?" The clouds separate and a booming voice exclaims, "You are!" and the clouds close once again. "I told you," says the lone voter. "God says I'm right. " To ivhich one of the three voters says: "So what! It's still three to two. " * * * Therein he the travailsofTown Councilor James Munafo of Hyannis, an elected official convinced he is right but as often finding himself on the lonesome side of the town council vote. Hislatest minority vote was apuzzler -the only councilor to vote againstthe school budget, which is not such a strange thing in itself, particularly where he is concerned. The reasons behind the vote are an oblique matter. A press report noted that Munafo balked at explaining his nay vote when asked to do so by Councilor Tom Rugo. But, Munafo said in an interview last week, that wasn't the case. "It was getting late but I was ready to start explaining it when Councilor (Richard ) Barry stepped up and objected . I was ready. I could talk about it all day." Which, nearing 11p.m., is a good enough reason for Barry 's objection. To understand Munafo 's opposition to the public school budget , one must first "try"to un- derstand Munafo .a devout Christian to the point that he and his wife began to home-school their four children after the 4th Grade because they had issues with the public curriculum,particularly teachings the Munafosbelieved were not "family friendly and outside the scope of our faith." What does that mean? "We can't answer what marriage was or what it is now," he says. Mean- ing? The issue of gay marriage. There are other fundamental issues too, such as evolution. "We thought our children would be better taught through church and family,"he says. The children were home-schooled until "we were fortunate enough to get them in the New Testament Chris- tian School in Cedarville."Of his two eldest , a son, is at Mass. Maritime Academy and a daughter at Cape Cod Community College. "You see they are public schools. We're more concerned with the (more formative) early child- hood education. " His wife stayed home to school their children while Munafo worked several jobs to keep the family afloat financially. "Do you consider yourself out of the main- stream?" he is asked. "Oh, big time,"is his candid reply. But it'shard to tell these days, given President Bush's elec- tion base of conservative Christians whether it is Munafo who is out of the mainstream , or the rest of us as the battle for the minds and hearts of the masses rages. "Look at the standards of 50 years ago and I'd be in the mainstream ," he professes. Munafo 's pronouncements take on a mission- ary's zeal when it comes to the fundamental s of public finance and philosophy, his values heavily influenced by religion versus "people who can have a philosophy but no religion." During the interview, the councilor couched some of his beliefs in vague terminology such as "family values." But with coaxing he'll admit to some so-called politically incorrect observa- tions, such as the state "taking away the mental institution leaving us now with a slew of home- less issues." To compress many minutes of discourse into space this column can accommodate , Munafo 's reasons for voting against the school budget en- compass roughly theseviews: Current curriculum does not meet his ideas of what education should be; the municipality should be more a rugged individual and not take money from the state so it can control its own educational destiny; teach- ers and school systems need not be criticized because education is a parent's responsibility and, in the final analysis, Munafo will not vote a school budget until its fiscal and philosophical outlooks match his. But even as he may feel God is on his side, the vote, for the foreseeable future , will still be 12-2. BY ELLEN C. CHAHEY columnist(a)barnstablepatnot.com D oes anyone remember the con- scientious objectors? They are patriots too. During World War II, one of my mother 's cousins, a son of immigrants, chose the "CO" option. His service to the country was to eat experimental low- and high-calorie diets. My mother, a daughter of immigrants , told me about Ted showing up once in a while either scrawny or fat for our country. He wound up marrying the dietician who designed his diets. In our college years, I met the man who is now my husband. There was a war going on then , too , and for the last time in recent history, there was a draft , based upon birth dates. He - we - drew number five. Canada? Jail? CO status? Again, it was about living in and lov- ing the United States and also hating war. After reading some heartfelt let- ters from journalism professors , one of whom was a military officer and one of whom wrote a column for a conserva- tive newspaper , a draft board agreed that we as a nation were respecting a conscientious objector , not a draft dodger. Once the CO status was granted , the deal was that he - we - for two years could not accept any job that would ad- vance his career. Because he did not as- pire to work for a hospital , he accepted a job offer to do his alternative service at Children 's Hospital in Boston. We discovered later that a top executive there had been a conscientious objec- tor during another war. My husband did so well in his as- signments at Children 's that he stayed for 15 years, during which he helped manage programs for children who were physically ill and for those with learning problems. He helped to set up a developmental screening program for children in one of Boston's poorest neighborhoods. While many others in the city were enjoying a few days off during the blizzard of 1978. he joined his colleagues to help the hospital and its little patients. The President at the time announced an end to the draft something like two weeks before my husband' s CO status would have ended anyway. With a sense of humor, on the last day of his service I bought a remnant of red carpet and rolled it down the hallway of the apart- ment where we lived then. But we both knew that as he walked it , he could walk proudly. When my husband and I die, we will not be entitled to plots in a national cemetery or flag logos in our obituar- ies. We fly the flag, though , and we love the United States of America , where my family is so new that my father 's parents never even learned to speak English. We live in violent times. I personally have had to fight to defend myself, and I'd do it again. Yet there 's another task for us. Re- member the conscientious objectors. The Rev. Ellen C Chahey is Minister of Spiritual Care at Federated Church ot Hyannis. INOTHER WJDS LETTERS Council's law violates homeowners1 rights The Barnst able Town Council has attacked our homes. Last Thursday night the Barnstable Town Council passed a new law that will control how many people can live in our homes. I find this new law, which will give them the power to fine us $300 a day, intrusive and unconstitutional. In terms of how many per bedroom , the rule states: two for the first two 4 bedrooms and one for the third , fourt h, fifth , etc. Do the math: in a three-bedroom home , five is the limit now. In a time of economic hard- ship, many adult children need to remain or return home to make ends meet. According to this new law, larger families no longer have the right to have all of their adult children , parents, siblings or other loved ones stay with them in a time of need because this is now against the law. We've all been reading about how difficult it is for young adults to make it here on Cape Cod and how we have a problem with them moving off Cape. It seems to me that this is not a concern of our Town Councilors who are now makingit alaw that a number of our children must leave the Cape as they will not be allowed to live at home any longer. The reasoning for this new law was to address a few instances of overcrowding problems, namely inHyannis.One examplereferred to a rental that had 27 people liv- ing in it. Town Councilor Harold Tobey saidthat there was no way that something like this could be stopped without this new law. I disagree with this. The fire department could have come in and declared it a fire safety situation. The department of publichealth could have comein as well. The police can certainly deal with disturbing the peace CONTINUED ON PAGE A:14 Letters to the editor I The Barnst able Patriot welcomes let- ters to the editor. Please keep them brief and either type or print them neatly. Include name , address and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be published , but names will be withheld upon request. We reserve the right to edit all submissions. THE BARNSTABLE PATRIOT P.O. BOX 1208. HYANNIS. MA 02601 COMMENTARY By Rick Prebrey www.haconcape.org "I never saw a40BI didn't like,"the head of a town housing committee told me today. After a moment's thought , I agreed. I think it is a terrific law. The more time goes by, the more I see the wisdom in it. First , because towns deserve it for the pa- thetically little they have done to make sure all their citizens have had safe and decent places to live for the 35 years since the law was passed. No number of questionable 40B proposals willever equal the shameful neglect that those needing housing have suffered. Second, because the deck is so overwhelm- ingly stacked against the development of housing that is affordable for the typical household earning below the median income. Almost all the state and federal housing programs of the past 30 years have disap- peared or been shrunken into irrelevancy. There is a long list of programs that I knew well that are gone. Thousands of potential units have been lost on Cape Cod alone. Zoning for multifamily rentals? "Hell no!" Sewer systems? "I'mnot paying- and besides, they will cause growth." {But haven 't we had grow th anyway?) Third , because the public will rarely lift a finger to help or support the creation of more than one unit at a time, yet will scream bloody murder about any proposal that they perceive has even the slightest effect on them. No matter that dozens might for the first time in their lives get a decent place to live, it they fear the development might affect their property values! I didn't think that having a decent place to live was about property values. Try living on the street and investing in something else. Fourth, most of those whining about 40B's wouldn't recognize one if they saw it. There are about 88 40B projects providing useful housing for families and senior citizens on the Cape , many of which were rental devel- opments built more than 20 years ago. Do you object to those? Can you name three? Do you even know where they are? Fifth , if I hear one more time how much a 40B will hurt the environment or violate zoning I may jump off the top floor of the new Cape Cod Hospital addition. I'll say it once more: The damage to the environ- ment and the corruption of zoning done by 40B is meaningless compared to what non-affordable development has done. // the Cape is being ruined , it is not from new affordable homes. Less than 2 1/2 percent of the residential housing on the Cape has been developed using 40B and that doesn't even consider the additional development which has been commercial. Sixth,other than payingthe lawyers to fight against it, 40B doesn't cost anything. What about kids in school, you say? 40B is not a fertility program. There are no new kids as a result of 40B. But, a healthy place to live helps kids who are here stay healthy, helps kids do better in school; helps kids become better employees and be more likely to sup- port themselves and others. Try getting rid of 40B and then paying the additional costs related to people having no place to live. Seventh , how about fairness? Doesn't it seem fair that in a great country like this that everyone has a decent place to live? Don't like the sound of that? How about this: Doesn't it seem fair that a 35-year-old couple who are both workingfull time should be able to afford a decent home? Doesn't it seem reasonable that an 80-year-old should be able to rent an apartment that s/he can afford for the last years of his/her life ? Eighth , the Cape has a huge problem with young people leaving because of high hous- ing costs. We are losing our educated labor force and the quality of many services is already suffering. Ninth, lots of the 40B proposal s you read about inthe paper are no big deal. You should listen to some of the complaints closely the way I sometimes have to. Some neighbors showed up to complain about one proposed 12-unit project , for those over 55 years old , because it might impact parking for the lo- cal Cape League team's home games even though the development isn't even on the same street! If you keep track of the proposals , which sometimes seem to be objectionable on some rational basis, most are dramatically changed during the permitting process or many never get built at all. 40B. although not perfect , has been a valu- able tool for decades. Now is the time to see it the way it really is and to use it creatively to help solve our pressing housing problem. Report s of the need to kill it are greatly- exaggerated. Rick Presbrey is the Executive Director ot Hous- ing Assistance Corporation. He can be reached at rpresbrey@haconcapecod.org. Nine reasons to like Chapter 40B ACROSS TIME 6PLACE n RETROSPECTIVES FROM THE ARCHIVES BARNSTABLE PATRIOT PHOTO ARCHIVES CAPECOD CREAMERY - SEASTREET,HYANNIS•1930-The Cape CodCreamery onSea Street in Hyannis was one of several creameries in town in the 1930s, and among the busiest. 4, ' medical^^^' reserve M m 508-394-6811 corps r ^ Be informed. Be prepared. Be a volunteer. Emergency preparedness is everyone 's responsibility. www.capecodmrc.org