Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Barnstable Patriot
Barnstable, Massachusetts
April 7, 2006     Barnstable Patriot
PAGE 7     (7 of 30 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 7     (7 of 30 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
April 7, 2006
 
Newspaper Archive of Barnstable Patriot produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




Where is consensus to mess with Cape Cod Commission? .c° F^ I S I _J CORNER By Paul Gauvin By Paul Gauvln pgauvin@barnstablepairiot.com A boy visiting his grandma was kneel- ing by the bed saying night prayers. "Grandma," he asked, "is it true we come from dust and when we die we become dust again?" "Yes," answered grandma religiously. "Why do you ask?" "Look under the bed ," replied the boy. "Somebody's either coming or going." It's an anecdote that begs the question of whether the Cape Cod Commission is stillcoming-or going.There is arecurrent push by several groups - now evidently consolidated in purpose -to either disem- bowel the agency or to plot its piecemeal town-by-town execution by secession. One has to wonder where this new cabal acquired the chutzpah to attempt to undo a referendum vote without considering a Cape-wide public poll on the question of the commission's fate. And why did the group feel it necessary to conduct a clan- destine meeting to connive against achild of the people -and bounce arepresentative of the other side? If memory serves, the Cape Cod Com- mission was thoroughly debated prior to the popular vote that gave birth to the agency specifically designed to manage the "big picture " of growth. The voters approved it after listening to both sides of the lengthy debate (why hear it again?) and subsequently empowered a legal body to, as Archie Bunker might put it, "stifle" rampant growth. At the time, the majority of voters saw rapid development threatening to reshape Cape Cod into a grid-locked developers ' Mecca at the ex- pense of citizens enamored of small town, seaside ambience. Those putting the commission in the crosshairs of their grenade launchers - most of whom, one presumes, are busi- nessmen with self-interests who are ag- grieved by the Commission's tough-love tactics -cert ainly have the absolute right to agitate for change that would moder- ate their path through the maze of codes and costs that have discouraged all but the brave entrep v.neurs to sow and reap. But it ought not oe attempted without the puolic consensus. BJ's and The Home Depot , two giants of retailing, had to jump through so many hoops that they got a severe case of'hoop- ing' cough. They survived the exhaustive commission process because of their sub- stantial assets and surfeit of patience. And at that, they were allowed to de- velop on the Cape only at less than full strength, denying Cape Codders the ex- panded product savings they could have enjoyed from these mega-outlets had they been fully developed. In the process, one presumes some small businesses were spared. That , from this corner, appears to be an equitable compromise managed by the commission. Further, it seems nonsensical for the Citytown of Barnstable to pay its share of Commission expenses-currently $463,575 a year - or a whopping $6.6 million since 1991 - and then tell the commission it wants to manage its own growth, to make its own deals with developers. Then why pay the commission? Should it not be one or the other? For the moment , the saber rattling sprouts from the original sources that op- posed the Commission in the first place, the developers and fringe bizlosophers that, left to their own devices, would, if past is prologue, make of Cape Cod The Little Apple. The group that met behind closed doors two weeks ago and byinvitation only saysit seeks "major reforms"of the Commission. That presumablymeanswateringdownthe countywide agency's powers until all that is left is a toothless, multi-million dollar gargantuan without the vigor to gum a marshmallow. What has changed since then to make these groupsbelieve the public wants more of everything, including the bad stuff that clings to rapid development? Has a broad consensusemerged from Mr.andMrs. Cape Cod to pull the plug on the Commission, to anesthetize its muscle? Hardly. Whatever strategies this new search- and-destroy platoon chooses,its members would do well to first beg the indulgence of the majority of voters who launched the agency and,being of sound body and mind at the time, dictated a stringent "goslow" policy on development. In Barnstable 's case, taxpayers are in no mood to support the commission and a duplicate town staff to do the same thing. Countywide , what voters hath put together, let no self-serving sub-culture put asunder - without voter concurrence beforehand. Help the homeless now The fates of the alternative homeless shelter (the Pilot House) and the Hyannis homeless outreach worker position are injeopardy. News of their funding crisiswashighlighted last week at the Barnstable Assembly of Delegates meet- ing.In addition,newspaper stories, WQRC radio and C3TV, Channel 17, have been broadcasting this crisis at hand. A very generous business person who has donated more than $75,000 over the past two years to the Cape Cod Council of Churches for the Overnights of Hospitality Program and the Pilot House has come forward again saying she will match up to $25,000 any donations made for the Pilot House or the Homeless Outreach Worker position. To date, $6,340 has been re- ceived and $4,000 came from one person. Pilot House has been forced again to a new location and will locate within two weeks and desperately needs funds to make the transition and to survive. During the last move, they cried out for help. The help wasn't there and the men and women who were at Pilot House doing so well were turned back to the streets. I fear this will happen again as only a few people on Cape Cod seem to care. Someone said to me today, "Do you think the word is out there well enough for people to know of the needs here?" My answer is this: "Every adult on Cape Cod knows that we have men and women suffering and dying on our streets. They know all too well, and sadly I feel that only afew seem to care. I'm very saddened by this lack of loving kindness. This past year, eight men and women died on our streets in a pathetic homeless state. This is not the Cape Cod I knew as a child. What has happened to us? Why have we become so self-centered and self-serving?" Our brothers and sisters in need , need you. Yes, you! Once again, I make the urgent plea. Please send donations to: Cape Cod Council of Churches, PO. Box 758, Hyannis, MA 02601. Please earmark donations for Pilot House and/or outreach worker position. Anyone is welcome to call me at 508-360-7006 to learn more. Alan Burt Centerville PS. C3TV, Channel 17, will be broadcasting a program on the Pilot House and the home- less outreach worker position this Saturday at 2 p.m. I encourage you to watch as you will become better informed about the issues of homelessness and the importance of the Pilot House and the outreach worker position. On other Saturdays at noon, same channel, there willbe a series titled ,Hearts of the Home- less and Hearts for the Homeless. Hearts of the Homeless willhave interviews I've done with our homeless friends over the past couple of years. Heartsfor the Homeless are interviewsI've done with other advocates for the homeless. Generating misinformation While those who would favor opening Nan- tucket Sound to industrial development are entitled to engage in armchair quarterbacking. Mr. Richard C. Bartlett's recent letter, "Let there be light" (March 24), shines brightly with at least two factual errors: 1.1was not the Alliance's "PR vicepresident" at any time during my involvement with the organization. 2. The media widely reported I revealed au- thorship of the infamous press release in March 2004. Bartlett'sassertion that I waited until two years later is absolutely wrong. Mr. Bartlett would do well to practice what he preaches and avoid spreading "mythsand false- hoods." Or, he might at least suppress his own wind energy until he gets the facts straight. John Donelan Centerville End Cape commission's regulatory role The Cape Cod Commission was envisioned as a technical advisory group that would AD- VISE the Cape towns on the best course for growth. Instead it has become an appointed (not elected) SUPER County REGULATORY agency that is now telling towns how they will grow. Their mandate was to expand good eco- nomic job growth, but instead the Cape Cod Commission has discouraged companies that would bring good jobs to the Cape. There are few non-service jobs for our children and those technicaljobs and our children are being forced over the bridge. Many Cape towns are reviewing the pro- cedures for withdrawing from the Cape Cod Commission. I believe that Barnstable should also start that process. The consensus of influential group of citizens from Sandwich, Bourne , Mashpee, Barnstable and Orleansthat met last week,strongly believe that the citizens and their elected officials can and should determine the future of our town. We do not need the Cape Cod Commission to regulate our future and we certainly can put to excellent use the more than 1/2 million dollars ANNUALLY that the taxpayers of Barnstable are required to pay to support the Cape Cod Commission. CONTINUED ON PAGE A:12 LETTERS Letters to the editor The Barnstable Patriot welcomes letters to the editor. Please keep them brief and either type or print them neatly. Include name , address and telephone number. Anony- mous letters will not be published , but names will be withheld upon request. We reserve the right to edit all submissions. THE BARNSTABLE PATRIOT , P.O. BOX 1208, HYANNIS . MA 02601 OR E-MAIL TO letters@barnstablepatriol.com columnist@barnstablepatnot.com By Stew Goodwin columnist@barnstablepatriot.com The turbulent and uncertain world that awaits us as we awake each morning cries out for a ray of hope. I am going to tell you about a person who has and can serve as an inspiration. Her life was short and pain-filled. Yet her compassion and empathy affected allwho she managed to touch. Her writings are varied and extensive. Yet the intensity ofherintellect and emotions leap off every page to embrace the reader. She never formally joined a faith. Yet theo- logians of all stripes have been moved by her love and her belief. Shewasborninto prosperity.Yetshe devoted her life to the disadvantaged and oppressed. She lived at a time when prejudice and persecution ran rife. Yet she shines for us as a symbol of tolerance and inclusion, a ray of hope. Simone Weil was born a French- woman in 1909. She died thirty-four years later, an exile in war-torn England. While she possessed an ad- vanced degree in philosophy, was an accredited secondary school teacher in that discipline, and eventually attained an international reputa- tion, she was frequently lured into all-consuming social activism. Weilwas an early foe of fascism,volunteering to oppose it in the Spanish Civil War, in which she was wounded. At the time of her death she was servingaspart of the government that was planningthe re-conquest of hernative France from the occupying Germans. Simone Weil sympathized with the working class, and thus was drawn to the physical toil of factories and vineyards. But despite her frail constitution she never permitted herself to eat , or dress, or dwell better than the least of her laboring compatriots. This tendency was an outgrowth of her conviction that a viable social contract was primarily a collection of linked obligations to be honored rather than bundled rights to be trumpeted. Weilthought and acted withthese obligations constantly in mind,and this has alot to do with her impact over the years. It was her opinion that fulfillment of societal obligations before insisting upon rights would produce more satisfaction with less strife. Simone Weil was a deeply spiritual person who felt a mystical union with God. She was alsoinclusive inher beliefs, asher words attest. "Children of God should not have any other country here below but the universe itself,the totality of all reasoning creatures it ever has contained , contains, or ever will contain. That is the native city to which we owe our love." Many present day evaluators, such as Martin Andic, see her in a similar light. "The true God for Simone Weilis a God of love and peace who welcomes everyone and everything." Simone Weil was certain that basic human- ity lay at the core of every culture , despite the layers of power-hunger and self-interest that might obscure it. She was instinctively able to locate this core, and to nuture it. In fact, she dedicated her short life to this task. For most of us it is difficult to avoid the temptations and propaganda in order to realize that respect for each human as alivingbeing iswhat really matters. For Weil this realization was second nature, and that is the essence of her greatness. Happily, this remarkable woman has had many suc- cessors. You may know some of them. They, like her, have understood that any society which venerates democratic and compassion- ate ideals will be judged by the status of its ordinary citizens and least fortunate members, not by the opulence of its wealthiest decile. They, like her, have grasped the fact that any society claimingto be spiritual,not theocratic, will be evaluated on its ability to sustain life, not destroy it. In my most pessimistic moments, which have been surfacing more frequently of late, I am encouraged by the thousands of latter day Simone Weils now humbly at work in our communities. They offer the spiritual hearth this country has always sought to provide. They, not politicians or corporations; not fundamentalists or ideologues,reflect the basic character of our nation. These Simone Weils of ours constitute a badly needed ray of hope. A ray of hope Call and response on Commission controversy Editor 's note: Peter Doiron of Barnstable sent an e-mail to town councilors and the town's legislative delegation asking whether they attended a recent meeting of Cape Cod Com- mission critics held at the Rectrix Aerodrome in Hyannis. His query and council President Hank Farnham's reply are below. Did any of you representatives attend last Thursday's meeting at Rectrix Aerodrome? Were any of you invited by Council President Farnham, or Representative Atsalis,or Airport Commissioner Wheatley (supposedly a one- time JAG member) ? Are any of you in favor of the putsch proclaimed by the 50-some people who participated? Remember the Cape Cod Commission isthe peoples ' business and you all by taking part in such a gathering represent the people , not just the business or capitalistic or Chamber of Commerce interests. There 'smore to govern- ment than funding private greed. Remember also that "quorum"is not the only measure in defining what violatesMassachusetts Opening Meeting Laws.Many of you worthies attended the State Ethics presentation on Tuesday 3/28/03. Do not forget your lessons; the people haven't. Peter Doiron Barnstable Mr. Doiron: Henry Farnham responding: I attended the get-together at Rectrix that you reference, as an invited guest - not as an inviting organizer. I think one other Barnstable Town Councilor was there plus afew officials from other towns on Cape Cod. The majority in attendance were average, hard working citizens trying to eke out a living on Cape Cod, not the alleged capitalistic , greedy business moguls you like to promote. All the participants are commit- ted to making their communities better, and there are thousands more interested in the "putsch" that was evident at the Rectrix get together. Incidentally, the get together at Rectrixwas a private meeting of private citizens to discuss private issues. There was no official or semi- official business conducted or represented at any time by any governmental agency - state, county or local. There was no open meeting violation of any sort , so please don't continue with those threats - we understand the rules and we were in'attendance at the workshop at MME last Tuesday along with you and Mrs. Doiron. Please understand , Mr. Doiron, that all of the participants have one common goal - fix the mess the Cape Cod Commission has got- ten Cape Cod (especially Barnstable) into, help our businesses get better and encourage prospective new businesses to locate and grow here. We want to help the residential tax payers reduce their tax burden by building the com- mercial tax base (as other communities do) to take on more of the tax burden by being successful - not by taking unfair advantage of businesses as you propose through adopting a split tax rate. We want to see our students graduate from school (hopefully at a high level) and be able to find valuable , meaningful jobs on Cape Cod (especially Barnstable ). Far too many leave Cape Cod after graduation. Wewantto create more workforce housing on Cape Cod (especially Barnstable) to support those needed workers (private and municipal) of the future. We want to see creative business friendly zoning implemented on Cape Cod (especially Barnstable) to help foster needed changes to help achieve those goals while preserving our environment. We want to attract capital to help repair and grow our fragile economy and to diversify it. These are simple goals, to name just a few, but they are very complex to achieve without good community support. A positive thing you can do, Mr. Doiron ,is to assist the people to understand that without a strong economy, a community has no chance - without more governmental hand outs. We want our businesses to be self sufficient and to prosper! Regards, Henry Farnham West Barnstable