Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Barnstable Patriot
Barnstable, Massachusetts
March 31, 2006     Barnstable Patriot
PAGE 7     (7 of 34 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 7     (7 of 34 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
March 31, 2006
 
Newspaper Archive of Barnstable Patriot produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




Bush a true Conservative? Not! George W.Bush should outrage any Conserva- tive worth his salt. GW began his presidency speaking the rheto- ric of limited-government and professing the values of traditional Conservatism. He came into office promising not to undertake the "nation building" of Bill Clinton, while vowing never to commit troops without a clear "exit strategy." He was going to be the "compassionate con- servative." He sold himself as a leader who would be able to unite Americans and not divide them. Instead, the country's now more divided than anytime since the Civil War, and true conserva- tives are finallyseeing Bush, not as the inheritor of Theodore Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, but as the radical right wing neo-con ideologue he truly is. With double-speak that would make George Orwell blush, Bush has proposed policies based not on what was best for the country, but rather on what the polls suggested people wanted to hear. A forest policy designed to give more access to loggers was called the "Healthy Forests" bill, while his effort to reduce air quality standards was titled the "Clear Skies" act. In fact, while Bush tries to talk the talk of conservative values, the walk he has walked, with the policies he and his Republican Congress have implemented, has completely contradicted his phony professed values. President Bush may be many things, but a true conservative is not one of them. A true conserva- tive does not pursue a go-it-alone foreign policy using preemptive military force to achieve regime change in countries of the Middle East he doesn't like. Such a policy, based on flawed and manipu- lated intelligence, is arrogant and self-defeat- ing, and only serves to enrage and motivate our enemies while alienating our allies. When GW entered office, he promised to reduce the spending of the federal government. Instead, what he did was to turn large budget surpluses into record deficits. Amazingly,he has presided over the highest rate of increase in discretionary spending in 40 years. While calling the Demo- crats big-spending liberals, Bush has proposed program after program that primarily benefit his corporate cronies while sticking future genera- tions with mounting debt. This is hardly the work of a true conservative. An honest to goodness conservative does not profess a belief in limited government and then undertake massive increases in the power, size and cost of government. With the president's new poorly-crafted Medicare prescription drug plan, we see the largest expansion of government entitlements since President Johnson. With its complexity and arbitrariness, the only one mak- ing out with this program is the pharmaceutical industry. Is anyone surprised? A conservative is supposed to be about "conser- vation." about conserving the best of the past and the best of what we have. Republican President Theodore Roosevelt understood that, and that is why he undertook the creation of our national parks system. Now Bush sees our parks only as places where snowmobiles can roam free, timber can be harvested, and oil can be drilled for. While Bush has said we have an "oil addiction", in reality, he has done nothing serious to promote energy conservation, fuel-efficient cars, or the development of renewable energy. Of course, he won't do these things because they might upset his friends in the oil business. A true conservative has an abiding respect for the rule of law, both domestic and international. Not this president. Claiming the mantle of "strict constructionist," GW has managed to be the first president in our country's history to ask his law- yers to find a method to get around the Geneva conventions prohibiting torture. He's also found lawyers to give him legal opinions that as com- mander in chief he is well within his rights to "set aside" laws he deems problematic. Whether it's undertaking an illegal and immoral war in Iraq, justifying torture, or spying on Americans in viola- tion of the Constitution, George W Bush sees himself as just simply above the law. Those are not conservative propositions by any standard or definition. Whether it's William F.Buckley Jr., or former Reagan official Bruce Bartlett, or any number of past Bush appointees, conservatives of many stripes are now coming to see Bush and his cabal of neo-cons for the dangerous ideologues they are. These "true" conservatives are beginning -finally -to see that the damage Bush has done to the country is substantial and will haunt Americans for generations to come. As we approach the next election cycle, all Ameri- cans, and true conservatives in particular, must decide whether the status quo can continue. Under Republican control, Congress has abrogated its over- sight responsibilities and its duty to be the instru- ment of fiscal and government restraint. Bush has effectively cowed Congress and appointed only true believers to the federal courts. In effect, there is no check on this imperial presi- dent. The country cannot afford to let this situation continue. If the polls can be believed (and that's certainly questionable), voters are prepared to vote the Republican rascals out of Congress. For the sake of this great republic, let us hope they do. The unacceptable alternative is to allow the con- tinuing consolidation of power, incompetency and corruption by those who now run the country. From Mm By Richard Elrick pgauvin@barnstablepatriot.com Let law guide town emp loyee speech freedoms , not boss rule There must have been asale on muzzles at the pet store recently given the way some town employees get lock-jaw when talking to the media. Several employees - in a nation that prides itself on free speech - recently balked at press inquiries under orders, one said, to refer questions to depart - ment heads. But that's like asking Bush or Cheney what it's like to be riddled with shrapnel on the front lines. They don't know. TomMcKean, HealthDivision director, prefers health employees to refer media questions to him "so that we are all on the same page " He cites the example of a flock of starlings killed on Route 28 about a month ago. "Reporters wanted to know if we were going to test the birds for cause of death. We said we were not because they were killed by impact." He said he wouldn't have wanted the wrong information to panic the public. That's understandable given the international bird flu scare. But few occasions in general information gathering require bothering the boss. Example: Atty. Christine Palkoski was called at the new Growth Management Department to learn what her job as "regulatory coordinator"entailed,insofar as it was a new position. A clerk said Palkoski wasn't there and that Ruth Weil, department head, was at a meeting. The clerk said Palkoski was at the other town hall in the former Hinckley Building. Palkoski was contacted there and in- vited to outline her job description. She asked instead if she could call back in an hour. Certainly. Five hours later, Weil returned the call, noting that Palkoski was new to the job and that Weil would answer the questions, and she did, nicely explaining Palkoski's duties, sometimes for the record and sometimes not. Weil became agitated when she was asked Palkoski's age, saying the press had no right to ask. The press begs to differ. It can ask public employees any pertinent question of interest to the taxpayers. Employees are not, for their part, obliged to answer. Weil chose not to answer.When asked instead what year Palkoski graduated from law school, she said she didn't know. The questions were raised because an announcement in the town newslet- ter "Barnstable Bulletin" introduced Palkoski as one who "brings extensive trialexperience and in-depth knowledge of the district court system to the posi- tion."The press was attempting to gauge what "extensive" meant as in the case of another hire, Atty. Charles McLaughlin, who, it was noted in the same newslet- ter, "brings more than 31years of diverse legal experience..." a clearer gauge of accumulated legal acumen. When the press asked human resources director William Cole for Palkoski's re- sume,he saidhewasn't alawyer anddidn't know if an employee's resume was in the public domain. He would check. He later rendered an edited limited portion ofthe resume to the press outlining schooling and experience. Meanwhile, acallto the registrar'soffice at NE School of Law yielded a mega-fast response: Palkoski graduated May 28, 2004 - less than two years ago - but the registrar declined a date of birth. The District Attorney's office said Palkoski worked there as an assistant DA for 18 months.Wouldseasoned lawyersviewthat as "extensive trial experience?" Incidentally, Ms. Palkoski received her bachelor's degree in 2001. Her job with the town pays $56,000 a year (rounded), according to the treasurer 's office. In another example, a public works division chief who had ready answersto a situation said apologetically that he had to refer the press to the superintendent, Mark Ells, who was busy at the time but who called back several hours later to refer the press to other people the press had already contacted in the meantime. If this is the runaround citizens experi- ence withthe municipal government,then something'swronginRiver City. Gagrules create the perception that somebody is trying to hide or control public informa- tion or that paid employees on the front fines aren't qualified to answer simple questions of fact relating to their work. Meanwhile , reporters may want to consider dental studies in the knowledge that extracting information from public servants is sometimes akin to pulling teeth. 1C0RNER I _I _ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ By Paul Cauvin Clearing the decks A few observations to get off my chest, as the winter that never really was fades away: Christy Mihos' third party run for gover- nor appear s to be an exercise in ego, mixed with a bit of revenge. Mihos would have been a strong Republican candidate , and may well have won a GOP primary because unaffiliated (independent ) voters are al- lowed to cast ballots, and those voters are a natural constituency for the convenience mart king. Instead, all he will do as a third party candidate is ensure the election of a Democrat. He also risks becoming a clown- ish side-show; his first radio campaign tried to be funny, but instead sounded inane and amateurish. It seems that Mihos is angry at the state Republican Party for something (probably the way he was treated by party regulars during his stint on the Turnpike Authority) and is determined to teach it a lesson. Unfortunately, the only lesson that is likely to come out of his effort is how dangerous state Democrats are when they control all three branches of elected govern- ment. Remember the 1980s? Hold onto your wallet. A question about a common phrase: if shooting deaths caused by "gun violence," are stabbings caused by "knife violence?" Are auto crashes caused by "car violence?" Or is it rather silly to ascribe a human qual- ity to an inanimate object? Among the mourners at the recent funeral of Serbian butcher Slobodan Milosevic was Ramsey Clark. The same Ramsey Clark who is advising Saddam Hussein's "defense " team. The same Ramsey Clark who defend- ed one of the bombers of the US embassy in Kenya. The same Ramsey Clark who was once....United States Attorney General, the highest-ranking law enforcement official in the land.Thank God the republic survived that. It's always good to keep a few old com- munists around, for two reasons: some of us need reminders of the evils of communism, and old communists can be quite entertain- ing. Consider Russian Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov. He blames America for the spread of bird flu. Why? Because "...it's strange that not a single duck has yet died in America - they are all dying in Russia and European countries. This makes one seri- ously wonder why" The only thing it makes me wonder about is Zyuganov 's sanity. He's searching for dead ducks? What a quack. If you need a reason to be thankful for being an American, consider three words: freedom of speech. There's less of it in Eu- rope , and there 's certainly to be even less of it in the future because the European Union may adopt a "media code" to avoid angering radical Islamists (the kind who threaten to murder anyone who draws a cartoon they don't like). EU Justice and Security Com- missioner Franco Frattini said "...we are aware of the consequences of exercising the right of free expression; we can and we are ready to self-regulate that right." Wonderful. Then there was the recent instance in which Belgium's police were told not to arrest rampaging gangs of Moroccan thugs who were destroying cars and assaulting people on the streets. They were even reportedly told not to use their sirens because "...it might provoke the Moroccans. " Ah, Europe , reacting to threats as it often has: by get- ting on its knees. More European follies: If you think silly, irrelevant political correctness is bad in America (and it is), try England. Cox News Service reported that teachers at an Ox- fordshire school have changed the words of "Baa, Baa, Black Sheep" to "Baa, Baa, Rainbow Sheep". They've done it, of course, to avoid offending anyone. Again, Europe- ans on their knees. For those who don't want Arab govern - ments controlling terminals operations at American port s, it's already too late. A company called NSCSA has an interest in terminals at nine American ports, includ- ing Brooklyn, Baltimore and New Orleans. Large containers emblazoned with the initials NSCSA are plentiful in those ports. What is NSCSA? National Shipping Compa- ny of Saudi Arabia. And if Arab companies owning a presence in American terminal operations constitutes a threat , how can we allow Arab airlines to land at American airports? Speaking of Arabs, the world's most popular religion - Islam - may need a refor- mation (I can write that because this isn't Europe). Why? Too many Muslims citing their religionwhile happily sawing some- one's head off. Too much rioting over harm- less cartoons, while ignoring truly offensive cartoons about Jews. Too many madrasses carefully teaching Arab boys and girls how to hate Westerners. Certainly a majority of Muslims don't agree with the fanatics, but too many of them do. Islam needs what Christianity got. But as we know, such religion-shaping movements take centuries ... which tells us how long the war on terror might really last. • . From ik f iMT By Steve Tefft M Angst The last thing we old folks need is "Angst." You young people shouldn't be reading this, but if you do, "Angst" is a commonly used expression. It is the Ger- man word for "fright ." So, last week's Newspaper headlines, Television and Radio announcements: "Blood thinner medication Plavix and Aspirin may cause excessive bleeding or even death." Now, for someone who has had a stroke and needs these drugs,that alongwiththe Bird Flu, Mad Cow Disease and Osama bringing us a present in a shipping con- tainer is real "Angst." I called my Doctor. He called back and said; "Youknow more about this than I do." So, let's look at this. Is it Freedom of Speech? If an au- thor writes a book; "The Moon is made of Cheese" and another writes; "The Moon is not made of Cheese." If both of these books got published and sold, don't they both make money? When there is very little news for the media to report , wouldn't it be awful if there were only commercials? So, how about a little "Angst"? Well, I had to look at this a little more seriously. The excessive bleeding. A little while ago,I had an extensive extrac- tion of my teeth. My Oral Surgeon, who was very good, had no problems with my staying on the Blood thinner. I had very littlebleeding that night. I haven't,lately, had any bruising. Once in a while I get blue marks on the back of my hands. But, they go away. Rectal Bleeding; take a peek in the bowl, when you are done. That should tell you something. There is an old expression; "Don't fix what ain't broke"! I am staying with Plavixand Aspirin.Now,I don't want some of you Seniors to take my comments too seriously. You may have "excessive bleeding." You might "die." Klaus Guttmann Marstons Mills Airborne politics Is anyone free to cause the death of another person? If you don't want your view to include turbines l/5th the size of a toothpick do you have the right to aid global warming, acid rain, and corrupted air for all Cape Codders? It has been public knowledge for three A years that the American Lung Association and the Harvard School of Public Health have found from 12 to 15 lives per year could be saved if the windfarm were op- erating. Will someone in your family or neighborhood be in that number? Does Sen.Kennedy,Mr.Yearly,or Mr.Koch have a license to kill? Environmental Defense has conducted its 2005 survey of air pollution in America, listing the 50 cities with the dirtiest air. Boston ranked 15th. Since our Cape air is twice as polluted as Boston's, where do you reckon your town placed? Per capita C02 emissions in America is 5.6 tons. One half of U.S.electricity comes from coal-burning power plants,likeBray- ton Point. A vigorous renewable energy program could slow down climate change, which affects every one of us, whether or not you support the windfarm. Global warming and acid rain are indiscriminat- ing that way.So is it moral for opponents to inflict these ills on others? The Conservation Law Foundation re- ports 33acres of Cape beaches wash away yearly because of sea rise. This will only increase if we don't do drastic reductions in emissions from power plants and gas guzzlers. Will this beach erosion affect your lifestyle or property value? Whose interests are being served by Kennedy, Delahunt , Romney, Rielly, and O'Leary? Are they benefitting from the same source of cash as the infamous Guy Martin/Don Young combo? Senator Kerry, long a foot-dragger, has at least condemned the underhanded Young amendment. Perhaps that breaks hispat- tern of subservience to our senior senator. Many Massachusetts voters thank him for that, and hope it's a long-term position. We do remember gratefully Sen. Kerry's long battle to increase gas mileage, and remember his strong campaign pledges on renewable energy. Richard C. Bartlett Cotuit LEHERS Letters to the editor The Barnstable Patriot welcomes letters to the editor Pleasekeep them brief and either type orprint them neatly Include name, address and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be published, but nameswill be withheld upon request We reserve the right to edit all submissions THE MRNSTMii PATRIOT. P 0 BOX 1208. HYANNIS, MA 02601 OR E-MAIL TO let1ers@bamstablepatriol.com ,i